Рекомендуемая категория для самостоятельной подготовки:
Курсовая работа*
| Код |
582352 |
| Дата создания |
2019 |
| Страниц |
67
|
Мы сможем обработать ваш заказ (!) 17 сентября в 12:00 [мск] Файлы будут доступны для скачивания только после обработки заказа.
|
Содержание
Content
Introduction …………………………………………………………………3
Chapter 1. Metaphor as one of the stylistic device ………………………..5
1.1 The notion of metaphor ………………………………………………..5
1.2 Scientific theories of the study of metaphor ………………………….8
1.3 Definition of metaphor and the process of metaphorizing the meaning of words ……………………………………………………………………………..16
Chapter 2. Characteristic of a metaphor and its stylistic functions ………22
2.1The structure of a metaphor ………………………………………….22
2.2 Types of metaphors ……………………………………………………24
2.3 Functions of metaphors ……………………………………………….28
Chapter 3. The analysis of metaphors in Shakespeare's sonnets …………39
3.1 Classification and analysis of the peculiarities of the use of metaphor..39
3.2 The role of metaphor in the creation Shakespeare's sonnets …………46
3.3 Stylistic features of the use of metaphors in Shakespeare’s sonnets ..58
Conclusion …………………………………………………………………65
Bibliography ……………………………………………………………….66
Введение
Metaphor, which is one of the ways of understanding the world, is an integral part of the language. From ancient times to the present day it attracts special attention as an object of scientific research. In previous periods, the metaphor was considered as a means of creating imagery in the language, a stylistic device, a way of "decorating" speech. However, in recent years, the study of metaphors has moved to a qualitatively new level. The number of works on this topic has increased dramatically, which can be explained by new prospects for considering metaphors not only as an element of language, but also as an element of thinking. Currently, metaphor is increasingly being studied within the framework of cognitive linguistics, psycholinguistics, linguoculturology and other borderline Sciences.
This thesis is devoted to the study of metaphors in the sonnets of William Shakespeare.
The relevance of the topic is determined by the enduring nature of the value of Shakespeare's language, as well as due to modern trends in the study of metaphors in the light of cognitive theory, that is, the consideration of linguistic phenomena in relation to man, his activities and thinking. Metaphor is one of the main ways of figurative modeling and reflection of reality, including space. In cognitive linguistics metaphor is defined as everyday conceptual reality; it permeates the daily life of a person, structuring perception, thinking, activity, it is embedded in the conceptual system of a person. Therefore, at present, the metaphor is considered by linguists, its study is engaged in the framework of Sciences that study human cognitive activity, such as philosophy, psychology, and others (M. black, A. A. Richards, D. Davidson Vico and others).
The main purpose of this work is to reveal the linguistic features of the metaphor and its functions in Shakespeare's sonnets, since today the metaphor is considered not only as an artistic technique and a means of nomination, but also as a special way of thinking, when "a person learns the world through the awareness of his subject and theoretical activity in it ", through "thinking through" the knowledge gained before, when a new concept is created through the use of "literal" , "superficial" meaning of expression.
In accordance with the purpose of the study, the following tasks are expected to be performed:
1) consider the concept of metaphor of a General linguistic nature;
2) determine the meaning and classification of metaphors in stylistic theory.
3) identify cases of the use of metaphors and examine their nature in the sonnets by W. Shakespeare
4) to analyze the functional significance of metaphors in W. Shakespeare's sonnets
5) summarize the results
The object of our study is a metaphor, as one of the main worldview categories.
The subject of the research is the stylistic and artistic originality of the metaphors in Shakespeare's sonnets.
The theoretical significance of the work lies in the fact that the materials and observations presented in it may be of interest not only for language theorists, lexicologists, translators, but also for literary critics and other specialists engaged in the study of material in the field of metaphor theory, linguoculturology, functional stylistics, phraseology, etc.
The practical significance of the work is determined by the ability to use the results of the study in courses on lexicology, ethnolinguistics, cultural studies, in the practice of teaching foreign languages and Russian as a foreign language, in lexicographical and translation practice.
The main methods used in the work are the descriptive method, which includes observation, generalization, interpretation and classification, as well as methods of contextual linguistic and cultural analysis.
The theoretical basis for the study was the work of V. G. GAK, D. Davidson, D. Lakoff, V. N. Telia, M. Johnson, N. D. In studies on the problem of metaphor, the author emphasizes its important role in the construction of conceptual and verbal systems of man, its active participation in the categorization of language, the processes of thinking and perception.
This work consists of an introduction, three chapters, conclusion and bibliography.
Фрагмент работы для ознакомления
Content
Introduction …………………………………………………………………3
Chapter 1. Metaphor as one of the stylistic device ………………………..5
1.1 The notion of metaphor ………………………………………………..5
1.2 Scientific theories of the study of metaphor ………………………….8
1.3 Definition of metaphor and the process of metaphorizing the meaning of words ……………………………………………………………………………..16
Chapter 2. Characteristic of a metaphor and its stylistic functions ………22
2.1The structure of a metaphor ………………………………………….22
2.2 Types of metaphors ……………………………………………………24
2.3 Functions of metaphors ……………………………………………….28
Chapter 3. The analysis of metaphors in Shakespeare's sonnets …………39
3.1 Classification and analysis of the peculiarities of the use of metaphor..39
3.2 The role of metaphor in the creation Shakespeare's sonnets …………46
3.3 Stylistic features of the use of metaphors in Shakespeare’s sonnets ..58
Conclusion …………………………………………………………………65
Bibliography ……………………………………………………………….66
Список литературы
1. Arutyunova N. D. Language and the world of man. - M.: "Languages of Russian culture", 1999. - 578c.
2. Nikitina S. E., Vasilyeva N. In. Experimental system dictionary of stylistic terms. M., 1996. C. 94.
3. Hoffman R. Some implications of metaphor for philosophy and psychology of science – In: The ubiquity of metaphor. Amsterdam, 1985, p.479.
4. Sklyarevskaya G. N. Metaphor in the language system. – SPb., 1993. P. 6 – 10.
5. John R. Searle. Metaphor / / Theory of metaphor: Collection. - Moscow: Progress, 1990. – S. 315.
6. M. Black. Metaphor.// Theory of metaphor:a Compilation. - Moscow: Progress, 1990. - P. 162.
7. Paul Ricoeur. A living metaphor.// Theory of metaphor: a Compilation. - Moscow: Progress, 1990. – S. 442.
8. Miller Dzh. Images and patterns, assimilation and metaphor// Theory of metaphor: a Compilation. - Moscow: Progress, 1990. - P. 236-283.
9. Nikitin M. V. on the semantics of metaphor / / problems of linguistics 1979, № 1.
10. D. Linguistic anomaly// Philological studies. - M.-L.: Science, 1990. - P. 51-52.
11. M. Beardsley. Metaphorical plexus.// Theory of metaphor. - Moscow: Progress, 1990. - P. 207-208.
12. D. Davidson. What is the meaning of the metaphor.// Theory of metaphor. - Moscow: Progress, 1990. - P. 185-187.
13. A. Richards. Philosophy of rhetoric.// Theory of metaphor. - Moscow: Progress, 1990. - P. 46-50.
14. McCormack E. Cognitive theory of metaphor / / Theory of metaphor-M.: Progress, 1990.
15. Metaphor in language and text./ OTV. edited by V. N. Telia. - Moscow: Science, 1988. - 176s.
16. Teliya V. N. Connotative aspect of semantics of nominative units. - Moscow: Science, 1986. - 143c.
17. Harutyunova Metaphor and discourse / / theory of metaphor.- Moscow: Progress, 1990.
18. Rosenthal, D. E., Telenkov, M. A. Dictionary-reference book of linguistic terms. – Ed. 2-e, ISPR. and DOP. - M.: Education, 1976.-P. 176.
19. Timofeev, L. I., fundamentals of the theory of literature. - Moscow: Education, 1976. – P. 222.
20. Arnold I. V. Stylistics of the modern English language (decoding stylistics). Studies'. Manual for students. Ed.2-e] – L:Education, 1981. – P. 82.
21. Galperin I. R. Essays on the style of the English language. - Moscow: Publishing house of literature in foreign languages, 1958. - 459s.
22. Arutyunova N. D. Metaphor// Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary. 1990.P. 29.
23. Activity aspects of language / Resp. edited by V. N. Telia. - Moscow: Science, 1988. - 212c.
24. The human factor in language: Language mechanisms of expressiveness. - Moscow: Science, 1991. - 214s.
25. Arutyunova N. D. The language metaphor. Syntax and vocabulary / / Linguistics and poetics. - Moscow: Science, 1979. – S. 147-173.
26. Lakoff George, Johnson Mark. Metaphors that we live in // Theory of metaphor. M., 1990. P. 387 – 415.
27. Willeit, F. Metaphor and reality // Theory of metaphor. P. 83.
28. Ancient rhetoric. M., 1978.
29. Telia, VN. Metaphor as a model of meaning production and its expressive-evaluative function // Metaphor in language and text. M., 1988. P. 26-52
30. Telia V. N. Mechanisms of expressive coloring / / Human factor in language: Linguistic mechanisms of expressiveness. - Moscow: Science, 1991. - p. 36-66.
31. Aristotle. Poetics. Op. in 4 vol., Vol. 4. - Moscow: Education, 1984.
32. Kharchenko V. K. functions of Voronezh metaphor, 1992
33. Telia V. N. Types of language values. The associated meaning of a word in a language. - Moscow: Science, 1981. - 270s.
34. Anikst A. Shakespeare Publishing house "Artistic literature". - M.: 1963. - 615c.
35. Sharakshane, A. A., Shakespeare's Sonnets in the Training of Students at the Faculty of Foreign Languages (English)
36. Gililov I. M., a Game about William Shakespeare, or the Mystery of the Great Phoenix, M., "an Artist. Director, Theatre.", 1997.
37. The New Shorter Oxford Dictionary. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1993.
38. Smirnov, A. The Works Of Shakespeare. L., 1934.
39. Donskaya E. Some features of the language and style of Shakespeare's sonnets //Shakespeare's readings 1984, M., Nauka, 1984.
40. Etkind E. G., about conditionally-poetic and individual. (Shakespeare's sonnets in Russian translations), Mastery of translation 1966, M., 1968.
41. Anikst, 1974. Poems, sonnets and poems by Shakespeare - M.: Book, 1974.
42. Anikst A. Lyrics Shakespeare//Shakespeare, W. The Sonnets. M., "Rainbow", 1984.
43. Guseva L. V., Epithets in Shakespeare's sonnets, problems of stylistics and translation, Smolensk, 1976.
44. Arnold I. V. Stylistics of the modern English language. - "Education", 1990. - p. 300.
45. Anikst A. "The Sonnets" Of Shakespeare// William Shakespeare, Sonnets. M., 1979
46. Dubashinsky, William Shakespeare. Essay of creativity. - Moscow: Education, 1978,144 p.
47. Komarova V. p. Metaphors and allegories in Shakespeare's works. – L.: Publishing house leningr.UN-TA, 1989. - 200C.
48. Barg M. A., Shakespeare and history. - Moscow: Science, 1979. - 216s.
49. William Shakespeare Sonnets: a modern anthology of translations /Ed. from English. - SPb.: Azbuka-Klassika, 2004.
50. Online resource http://linguistic.ru
51. Online resource http://wikipedia.org
52. Online resource http://sonnets-best.narod.ru
Пожалуйста, внимательно изучайте содержание и фрагменты работы. Деньги за приобретённые готовые работы по причине несоответствия данной работы вашим требованиям или её уникальности не возвращаются.
* Категория работы носит оценочный характер в соответствии с качественными и количественными параметрами предоставляемого материала. Данный материал ни целиком, ни любая из его частей не является готовым научным трудом, выпускной квалификационной работой, научным докладом или иной работой, предусмотренной государственной системой научной аттестации или необходимой для прохождения промежуточной или итоговой аттестации. Данный материал представляет собой субъективный результат обработки, структурирования и форматирования собранной его автором информации и предназначен, прежде всего, для использования в качестве источника для самостоятельной подготовки работы указанной тематики.
bmt: 0.00503