Грамматика текста (типы текстов и их грамматические особенности)

Доклад на англ. "Грамматика текста (типы текстов и их грамматические особенности)"

Грамматика текста (типы текстов и их грамматические особенности)

E.g. Defrost your freezer and there’s no need to let good food go to waste whilst you spend hours painfully defrosting your clogged up freezer. This new ground-breaking Anti-Frost Mat prevents icy build-up in your freezer.
You’ll never again need to chip and hack away at layers of ice to get to your frozen goods. Instead, place this specially-coated mat on the bottom of your freezer and frost won’t have a chance to form. With no frost build-up in your freezer, the anti-frost mat helps minimize blockages in freezer drainage tubes that can lead to ‘icebergs’.
Product size is a generous 47 cm x 24 cm.
(Daily Mail, 2007)
However, the evocative/operative text type combined simple and complicated sentences. Speaking about narration (report) it is necessary to observe the following things:
1/the logic sequence of sentences.
2/dynamism, change of events.
3) the chronological order of the ideas revealing.
In the narration are used simple and compound sentences with a verbal predicate of a perfective aspect; or with the aspectual-temporal forms underlining character and change or expressing cause-and-effect phenomenon:
Sir, Your report on the proposed changes to the university research funding system claimed that state funding for top-rated departments will be spread wider across the sector. The spread remains, however, relatively limited and research funding concentration is still a priority for the government.
More than 21 m pounds has been deducted from departments judged to have research of “national excellence in virtually all research activity” in the measures. There has been a 43 per reduction of funding for these departments since 2001-02. The reduction is putting continued existence of some departments in jeopardy. A quarter of all research-active staff in the UK – 12,000 academics – are working in these departments.
While the extra funding for the top-rated departments is welcome, reducing the funding for other outstanding departments is unnecessary and unproductive, and appears to amount to a policy of robbing Peter to pay Paul.